5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and implement Section 302, emphasizing the importance of the fair and just legal system. It's very important for society to understand the gravity of this offense and also the need for stringent punishment to discourage opportunity offenders and be certain justice for the victims and their households.
As a society, it is essential to continue striving for a just legal system that ensures fairness, protection, and regard for all individuals’ right to life.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal advice or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed on the court in which the case has actually been or will be filed.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it truly is unclear the way it relates to any offered situation, typically rendering judgments based on the intent of lawmakers and the circumstances on the case at hand. These types of decisions become a guide for future similar cases.
Please use 1 username and password established from the options. If it does not work please test the other. Just about every allows single user access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have concluded your session in Manupatra.
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is nicely-settled that although contemplating the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must evaluate the benefit of many of the eligible candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of eligible candidates that are found to generally be most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored through the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part with the respondent department.
This guide presents useful insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case legislation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
Accessing free case law sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and everyone seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are in the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally sound, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion could possibly be viewed as, however, click here we've been clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject towards the approval from the competent authority.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Section 489-F of your Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and cash. Its primary objective would be to control counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity with the national currency.
Stacy, a tenant in the duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not provided her adequate notice before raising her rent, citing a brand new state law that requires a minimum of ninety times’ notice. Martin argues that the new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.